I seem to be over-reading UV by quite a margin. We have blue skies today and my unit is registering an index of 6.8. A friends WF station ( 9 miles from me) is reading between 4.5 and 5.5.
I’ve been updated to firmware 94, so I’ll leave it to settle in and see how it get’s on.
To be clear, the auto-calibration / continuous learning (CL) system is reliant upon the firmware, but a separate system. The rollout of Hub firmware v94 lays the technical foundation to enable the forthcoming CL system. However, you will not notice a difference in your UV values until we actually deploy the CL system for UV.
@val Note: the auto-calibration / continuous learning system for UV has not been deployed yet.
We added your two units to the beta group a few days ago and I just took a look and applied the analysis to both of your SKY units. Let me know if the data looks better starting tomorrow.
Others: thanks for your continued patience - we’re getting closer to moving the UV component of the CL process from beta to production.
Thank you, David @dsj. I only have SKY-Mobile up right now after getting the blinking red on the other SKY. Will the replacement SKY automatically pick up the beta group when I get it setup?
Not automatically, but hopefully by the time you get your new SKY the UV CL component will be in production. If not, remind me and I’ll add your new SKY to the beta group.
already your station number would help locate yours, I have a good clue where you are but still, I’m not so far from you and today I had about 6, indeed not 9.
Air and Sky can’t be upgraded remotely (until now for sure)
Your hub is at V94 (latest for now, hub can and will be updated automatically when needed)
Since you have re installed the Sky, no data we can compare for now
How is you sky setup ? Is it in open sky?
Maybe share a picture of the setup ? I guess tomorrow as night has come for us
Hi Gilles. I just checked and your SKY actually received an updated UV calibration this morning. However, when you deleted and re-added the device, this calibration data was lost (that’s an issue on our end we need to rectify). I’ll make sure the previous calibration is applied ASAP.